|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Zygoth wrote:Doing things this way doesn't make the experience more Blizzlike either. At no point in history was Vanilla WoW some weird hybrid with 1.12.1 skills/spells/talents, 1.4 item data and quests, and then some 1.6 and 1.7 battlegrounds half way implemented. Seriously, just give us 1.12.1 items and quests, and continue to release the raids incrementally.
Zygoth wrote:Guybrush wrote:Dozens of vanilla servers out there all on 1.12. Why are you here?
He/she probably came here because the official Nostalrius website passes this off as a 1.12.1 server that is just withholding some endgame content temporarily....I probably wouldn't have rolled here if I had known that all of the item data was retarded, there weren't BG rep items, and quests were missing. Blizzard didn't release the item data in incremental patches because they thought "at first the items should be like this...then a few months later they should be like this....and then finally like this."
They changed items per patch because the game was a work in progress. Blizzard learned from their mistakes and fixed them. At some point, somebody at Blizzard was like "Whoa...wait a sec, casters actually don't need Agilility. Let's fire whoever came up with that idea and then fix this gear so that the game will be better." By trying to replicate things in the order that Blizzard did, all that we're doing is intentionally recreating Blizzard's mistakes. As cute of an idea as it is, I think that it is sort of a dumb practice to intentionally make mistakes.
Doing things this way doesn't make the experience more Blizzlike either. At no point in history was Vanilla WoW some weird hybrid with 1.12.1 skills/spells/talents, 1.4 item data and quests, and then some 1.6 and 1.7 battlegrounds half way implemented. Seriously, just give us 1.12.1 items and quests, and continue to release the raids incrementally.
hrramos wrote:What about cenarion circle and timbermaw reputation items ( the enchanting receps) any 1 ?
|
![]() |
Viper wrote:
- New items for the following instances: Stratholme & Scholomance,
|
![]() |