smilkovpetko wrote:Starter rotation as i mention on previous post= Judgement of Crusade , Seal of Righteousness drink coffee until the end of the fight.
Maximum mana used 500 at beginning only..
Judgement of crusade refresh each swing you do so there is no point to reapply. Seal of Righteousness cost low mana and you need to use each 30 seconds ........ 30 seconds your mana will regen twice from bow.
Hm, I overlooked that. Been way too long. In that case, the mana should be a non-issue. However, this was neglecting the use of Consecration, Holy Shield, etc. which are typical Paladin aggro-building tools. The question remains: how do you build up threat comparable to a Warrior without going oom?
How did you conclude Trash Blade or Ironfoe?
So we can build up faster Rage?! hahahahhahaha
When i said strongest spell damage weapon , that means as much spell damage as we can get. Because it's Holy damage that make us Aggro Machine , not the melee.
...You're really being an idiot here. I was recommending them so that you land more Seal of Righteousness damage for threat. You still haven't explained how you intend to be getting so much threat compared to a Warrior, by the way.
Did you even check the link i posted you when you requested to see gear?
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=13492or you ignore comments same way like i will ignore you right now for talking nonsense .
I did. The numbers don't appear to be adding up and a lot of gear will be passed to Warriors first. Now I suppose that as a Paladin tank you could make looting easier on yourself by doing these dungeon runs without Warriors so that you're the only one who gets to roll on it. In short bursts you can afford to burn more mana anyway. If you try buying your gear off of the AH though you will be spending a long time farming gold for this shit.
smilkovpetko wrote:Ana wrote:Just for the record, if you keep "countering" everything people say with "arguments" such as "Spell Damage Weapon Give 3x Warrior Threat", noone sane is going to take you seriously.
/thread
their "arguments"?
i have "evidences".
Evidence doesn't absolve you of the need to explain yourself and neither does your "evidence" necessarily prove anything. I can't help but recall the amount of times people tried to "prove" maintanking paladins are good by linking aoe tanking Paladins. You use the word evidence as though it means "I don't have to explain myself, have a link, now I have won the argument." It's utterly daft.
https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xaf1/t31.0-8/11537893_10152922418035418_1125402418581393890_o.jpg
A warrior only needs to do 50% more white damage than you to output more aggro with his auto than the Paladin with his seal.
