Vanilla.re

Discuss anything here. But do not forget that our rules still apply !

Vanilla.re

by Plutanic » Thu Apr 14, 2016 5:23 am

Okay I want to be very clear about that website and those staff as I've been seeing so many ridiculous accusations being made, their intent is clear: GIVE THE PEOPLE THE REALM THEY LOST, They do not want peoples account information, they do not claim to have the source code or database to Nostalrius, they are waiting for it to be released so they can give the people what they want, simple as that, and anyone that can actually read could go to the site and find that for themselves, if you lot don't want to join their efforts to create a new wholesome Nostalrius to bring the old community back together then that's fine, I'm a simple ex nost player biding his time to see a new Nostalrius be created, Until then.
Plutanic
Tester
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by Rarilmar » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:41 am

Problem is Nostalrius got so much support it got over they're heads and they believe they can actually get a deal with Blizzard... so they won't release the source and database anymore in hopes of that dream. Blizzard will never re-release vanilla simply because classes are so much unbalanced and new players on retail now will check it out and cry about difficulty/classes so it's a hopeless dream.
User avatar
Rarilmar
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by Hydra9268 » Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:52 am

...and they'll go back to retail, and that's fine. For the rest of us we'll stay with legacy content. Vanilla isn't for everyone. Some people can go back to retail's pudding.
DO NOT WANT PRISTINE REALMS!!!
Hydra9268
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by thron » Thu Apr 14, 2016 10:25 am

I think this project not bad idea.Of course much will depend from team and developer of Vanilla.re

I could add that the community should stay together to give life the new project.

Friends ,if Nostalrius can not choose best successor,lets do it in a forum.
thron
Tester
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by Duninn » Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:39 pm

Why is it that everyone that champions for vanilla.re or for the data that their account is a day old?
Duninn
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by Noxm » Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:46 pm

Vanilla.re :

Image

Agressive marketing and they claimed they played Nostalrius and have 7 years experience dev team withtout clue

Abathur wrote:
DISCLAIMER
Any server that advertises itself to have been given access to any of our data is providing false information and should be avoided. We will provide this information when the time comes and we alone will announce it. Note that we have not released any data yet and will not do so prior to announcing it. It's worth mentioning that being in contact with Nostalrius regarding said data does not make you, or any other server favored above others and should not be advertised as such. We feel that it's the player(s) that should inform themselves and make their own decision as to where to go. We also urge players to follow proper account security when joining new servers.
Nostalrius PvP -
Noxm - <Core Raider of Emphasis>
Alt : Noxmk - Noxmq
User avatar
Noxm
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by Mopar » Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:48 pm

@Rarilmar - it's not so much that they are hoping for Blizzard to come around. I don't think anyone realistically expects that, especially those who have watched Blizz take down servers before.

What is the case here is that they actually filed suit against OVH, and OVH was going to just divert that lawsuit to the admins. The Nost staff is complying because they have to. And if they officially promote another server, it just opens them right back up to the lawsuit.

Remember this is not a DMCA take down notice. This is multi-billion dollar deep pockets Blizzard holding a gun to their heads and saying, "Comply, or else we pull the trigger."
The pizza level in my bloodstream is dangerously low.
User avatar
Mopar
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by Duninn » Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:49 pm

Post like this are just guerilla attacks to get more people under false pretences. Honestly there should be a wait time for post now to slow these downsl for new accounts.
Duninn
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by Roadbl0ck » Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:52 pm

Noxm wrote:Vanilla.re :

Image

Agressive marketing and they claimed they played Nostalrius and have 7 years experience dev team withtout clue

Abathur wrote:
DISCLAIMER
Any server that advertises itself to have been given access to any of our data is providing false information and should be avoided. We will provide this information when the time comes and we alone will announce it. Note that we have not released any data yet and will not do so prior to announcing it. It's worth mentioning that being in contact with Nostalrius regarding said data does not make you, or any other server favored above others and should not be advertised as such. We feel that it's the player(s) that should inform themselves and make their own decision as to where to go. We also urge players to follow proper account security when joining new servers.

You are again linking to a random poster from ArenaJunkies, a totally unrelated site and putting a header of vanilla.re above it.

I don't know if vanilla.re is legit or not (remains to be seen) but that's pure shitposting on your part.

Can I link a random poster on mmo-champ claiming that Nost staff pocketed donations and claim it as a legitimate source?
Unfortunately my original forum account was locked out.
You can find my previous posts here.
User avatar
Roadbl0ck
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: Vanilla.re

by Noxm » Thu Apr 14, 2016 12:55 pm

@Roadbl0ck Just my 2 cents, i cant unterstand why they claimed to play Nostalrius and didnt help them with 7 years dev experience. Where are they when nost need dev and tester ?

And btw nost will not give their anti cheat / anti bots tools.

if i would choose, i will help this No Mango Project https://www.reddit.com/r/wowservers/com ... c_setting/
Nostalrius PvP -
Noxm - <Core Raider of Emphasis>
Alt : Noxmk - Noxmq
User avatar
Noxm
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Next

Return to Off topic