Hello fellow Warriors,
I've been searching the forums for an answer to my dilemma, but so far no one seems to be having the same problem as me. Most threads I've looked at are started by someone who really wants to pvp, or really wants to pve, but not both. I have a mixed interest. I want to be able to pvp with my friends but also tank (dps is fine too but I understand having a fury warrior as dps in a dungeon is unlikely -- and I'm fine with tanking) high end dungeons like scholo/UBRS/etc, and on the rare occasion that my schedule allows me (and for some reason a group needs an OT or dps) maybe even MC.
My question is, which spec would be best? I was thinking dw fury because in pve it'd be better than arms, I could tank okay, and wouldn't be so bad in pvp. Whereas arms would be better in pvp, and I could probably OT well in it, but DPS is probably a lot worse.This is the spec I'm currently looking at http://db.vanillagaming.org/?talent#LbhxbhbZVVzmLxoVo with 3 extra points for maybe imp intercept, 1 more point in DW spec or shout or something... I don't know.
Contrary, here is a rough arms spec http://db.vanillagaming.org/?talent#LbhxbAboLuVVzV0L in case that turns out to be better
The problem with both specs is that I'm more concerned about damage than I am about picking up parry, shield spec, anticipation, i.e. useful tanking skills. Will this hurt my ability to tank dungeons or OT raids too much to the point where I can't do either? Or maybe just to the point where I can tank dungeons but not OT MC.
Since this is all just theory, let's just look at spec and assume I have good gear and know how to play my class.
Is asking to be able to pvp and pve decently as a vanilla warrior too much to ask?