Aethelwulf wrote:The trouble with dispelling CCs is that you can't dispel it if you're the one who is CC'd. To be fair, both Priests and Paladins can trinket out, but that's a 5min CD.
You've got to be joking, if a shaman is cc'd he can't purge, i'm not sure what your point is here.
Because no one cares. Not only is it dispellable (and the Horde is good at that) but it prevents the Fear completely so it doesn't even trigger diminishing returns. A Warlock's Fear doesn't even have a CD, so you Fear twice and wasted 1.5 seconds and some mana.
You're serious? a fear ward on an fc in wsg, or even a random healer in any pvp situation? Its not like shamans can instantly purge every single player removing all their buffs before the lock(s) can cast fear...
Further, since we're supposedly talking about "skilled" play, most of the time you have exactly one chance to fear a target, who care's if it doesn't activate diminishing returns, because they're never feared a second or a third time because they're now out of range. If you think fear being resisted is a big deal (which it is) then its every bit as damning when the target is immune because of fear ward.
No, it is definitely a matter of Alliance vs Horde for Warlocks. Losing out on some DoT duration doesn't compare.
I honestly don't even know what to say to this. If you think there isnt a difference in "some dot duration" in a teamfight doesn't matter, next time just have your dispels not dispel dots. We'll see how well that works.
Really, like you have made some really good points throughout this thread on why horde is (supposedly) the superior race, but when actually faced with real strengths of alliance (and weaknesses of horde) you just toss them aside as if it "doesn't matter." Give me a break. BoP IS a big deal. BoF IS a big deal, not just for locks, but many classes.
And honestly, you're completely biased if you think one side is infinitely more powerful than the other.