Banker account banned

[Delrith]

No, ffs what he is saying is he got the GOLD by exploiting the chests and bought the daggers legitimately through the AH. The message might be interpreted the way you say, but what he literally is saying there is that he used the exploit.
If you take the comma sentence away it's CLEAR that he is saying that he exploited those chests. "whoever was abusing the chests mentioned in viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5096&start=20 gets away scot-free?" implying that he used the exploit, was banned for it and now he is angry that the others using it aren't banned. The fact of the matter is, he is the one that got banned and he is openly speaking about a bug that he partook in, or at least he is suspiciously mentioning them and now you guys are arguing he is innocent.

[macgarthur]

No, ffs what he is saying is he got the GOLD by exploiting the chests and bought the daggers legitimately through the AH. The message might be interpreted the way you say, but what he literally is saying there is that he used the exploit.
If you take the comma sentence away it's CLEAR that he is saying that he exploited those chests. "whoever was abusing the chests mentioned in viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5096&start=20 gets away scot-free?" implying that he used the exploit, was banned for it and now he is angry that the others using it aren't banned. The fact of the matter is, he is the one that got banned and he is openly speaking about a bug that he partook in, or at least he is suspiciously mentioning them and now you guys are arguing he is innocent.

This is the point I was making. If he obtained the gold legally then he did nothing wrong, if he got the gold to buy the items using an exploit then he deserves the ban.

[Delrith]

Macgarthur is the only objective and seemingly intelligent person here!

[Azi]

L2r.

[Buiaka]

I quote that he wrote "do I get robbed off 1k gold and whoever was abusing the chests mentioned in viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5096&start=20, which I guess my ban is based on, gets away scot-free?" Can you not fucking read? That is a public admittance of abusing a bug. AKA EXPLOITING

You just went full retard.

@Delrith,

Never go full retard bro.

it is VERY clear that he is upset that he lost his alcor's OR the value of the alcors's in gold that he legitely farmed for.

I'd assume a GM traced where the alcors's originated from and since apparantly there was a chest bug that contained them, odds are they came from that chest. Now...this is only me assuming again but is it fair to ban an account that purchased items from other people, items that were found via chest exploit (unknowingly to the buyer) with legit gold? It just sounds too extreme to me...but hey, just my opinion.

Also, i understand that the bug chest got fixed but why are the people that chest exploited not getting banned?

[macgarthur]

I quote that he wrote "do I get robbed off 1k gold and whoever was abusing the chests mentioned in viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5096&start=20, which I guess my ban is based on, gets away scot-free?" Can you not fucking read? That is a public admittance of abusing a bug. AKA EXPLOITING

You just went full retard.

@Delrith,

Never go full retard bro.

it is VERY clear that he is upset that he lost his alcor's OR the value of the alcors's in gold that he legitely farmed for.

I'd assume a GM traced where the alcors's originated from and since apparantly there was a chest bug that contained them, odds are they came from that chest. Now...this is only me assuming again but is it fair to ban an account that purchased items from other people, items that were found via chest exploit (unknowingly to the buyer) with legit gold? It just sounds too extreme to me...but hey, just my opinion.

Also, i understand that the bug chest got fixed but why are the people that chest exploited not getting banned?

The million dollar question is did the gold used to buy the items from the AH come legally or illegally. Would be nice of a GM to step in here and explain the finer details of this. In my head I see several options to explain this.

Option #1: OP obtained gold legally, purchased the items from the AH from a stranger not knowing they were obtained via exploits and was banned for basically being an accessory in some way, or mistakenly banned thinking since he had the item obtained via an exploit it means he must have had something to do with it, guilty by association. Mistake Nostalrius.

Option #2: OP obtained gold illegally in some fashion, purchased the items from the AH from a stranger not knowing they were obtained via exploits and was banned for exploiting themselves. This whole situation may have flagged that person, since they owned said illegal item and were investigated and in the process revealing something illegal and banned. Mistake OP.

Option #3: OP obtained gold legally/illegally but purchased the item via the AH from a known person knowing the item was obtained via exploits and used the AH as some sort of barrier, thinking the team could not see the transaction because it was done via the AH not in person or via mail. Regardless of how the OP obtained their gold they were an accessory to the crime by knowingly purchasing illegal good. Mistake OP.

Option #4: Details are omitted from someone and we aren't getting the full story, therefore cannot come to any conclusion as all the facts are not presented.

[Gi01]

So which are the odds of having like 2K gold available without any exploit or hack?

[String]

Hi there,

PM me with your account name and I'll look into it.

Regards,
String

[Apinanraivo]

I got my account back a few days ago and Gi01 it's from a lot of farming for the right profession.