Hydra9268 wrote:b1oodx wrote:90% of this server prefers PvP. You 10% carebear PvErs are the reason Pandas infest retail your incessant crying has ruined WoW. Go back to Retail where your part of the 90% and continue to help make that game worse with every expansion.
So much of what you wrote is wrong.
You've taken the time to write a point by point of your argument. It's good that you've decided to voice your opinion, and you should definitely keep doing so in the future. I cannot help but feel though that your post doesn't really add anything to the discussion. Normally I'd ignore your post as a result, but because you seemed to have put an effort into it I'd like to give you some feedback.
Hydra9268 wrote:1. Players have no say in what expansion Blizzard decides to do. Blizzard doesn't ask players to vote for what expansion or features they would like to see next.
Right here you're trying to voice your opinion, yet you've stated it as a fact. What was the opinion you were trying to get across? And if you are stating it as a fact then what kind of evidence can you give to support this argument?
Hydra9268 wrote:2. Could you please provide actual data that shows "90% of this server perfers PVP"? Or did you just pull that number from your ass because it "feels" right? What other information do you have lurking in your ass? Can your ass tell us who shot JFK because it "feels" right?
No need to assume or call names, he made it up. No need to pay attention to it.
Hydra9268 wrote:3. PVE players, like PVP players, had nothing to do with Mist of Panderia. Again I point to #1. Blizzard, not the players, decided on this expansion. Chen Stormstout was something Samwise Didier came up with. So if you have a problem with WOW pandas go bitch to the person who actually created them.
Once again you're voicing an opinion here while you're making it sound like they're facts. I don't see how this is anything other than baseless assumptions. Please provide evidence. As a side note, it is probably true that Samwise Didier once drew up a Pandarian, it's also true they were an april fools joke. What I'm trying to say here is there are many things you can say about the pandaran concept so I feel it is quite the maze to walk through before you can get something useful out of it. Perhaps it's best to not pay any attention to this as well..
Hydra9268 wrote:4. Voicing an opinion or request for something isn't "incessant crying".
What does this add to your argument? Seems like you're just prodding him. Please rephrase and make sure to carry over the point that you were trying to make. If you simply disagree with his statement, then pay no mind to it. Best to not pay attention to it.
Hydra9268 wrote:5. The player base has nothing to do with how well a game will do. Why do you think we are all here playing vanilla? It has nothing to do with the players. It has to do with the fact that when Blizzard developed World of Warcraft they knew what they were doing. They didn't involve the players during its development and they continue to not involve players in the development of future expansions.
I'm actually shocked at most of this statement. Please step back from the argument and re-read this part. Of all the points you've made this one comes across as the most confusing to me. Perhaps it's worded wrongly but I read this as:
"A game will do well regardless of players. The developer never involved their players during the development and will never involve players in their content"An easy way to counter this statement: Here's an interview
http://finalboss.tv/main/2014/4/3/episo ... -interview. Press Ctrl+F to search through the article, use the keyword
"Feedback"Either way I hope you'll be able to benefit from my feedback. Carry on!
PvP is great btw. Please keep the server just the way it is PvP wise!!