Hi,
I know I am rerolling an old topic here - it is about respeccing cost.
I do think it should be capped at 5 gold for example. I know here comes the hardcore pro Blizzlike people: "but thats not retail...ladida" OK I know it is not retail. I am considering myself as an pro Blizzlike type of guy. But I do think there is some room of improvement. Like you did with herbs spawnrate or mob spawnrates. You changed that pretty fast which is great imo.
But for the Suggestion of respeccing cost you just answer with a simple no. I think the server community deserves some influence in things like that. Please make a poll about it so the community can decide if they want it or not.
Please do not answer with a simple no.
21 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Please do not answer with a simple no.
No...
The #1 reason democracy fails is talking to the average voter...
If this server added everything a qq post like this suggests we would have transmog, "casual" difficulty raids and dungeons, dungeon finder, and probably a feral dps toping meters in raids.
Blizzard made this mistake already, and now look at the playerbase...
The #1 reason democracy fails is talking to the average voter...
If this server added everything a qq post like this suggests we would have transmog, "casual" difficulty raids and dungeons, dungeon finder, and probably a feral dps toping meters in raids.
Blizzard made this mistake already, and now look at the playerbase...
...
-
TaurenRogue
- Sergeant Major
Re: Please do not answer with a simple no.
If a simple no wont do it, how a big fat one? NO!
- Storfan
- Sergeant
Re: Please do not answer with a simple no.
Wow you give not a single argument supporting your opinion here.
Changing the cost of respeccing is only a tiny change that wont effect raiding in a negative way at all. The Server will benefit from it. You can change speccs for PVP for example. You could even try out some new speccs from time to time. I do think that it wont be a big change in the vanilla experience. There is probably no argument you can bring up except: "thats not how it was in retail". I only played Classic WoW my hole life because everything else was just not good imo. So I am not pro transmog or pro dungeon finder or whatever they implemented at 2.0. But I do think that this small change will effect the server community in a positive way.
Changing the cost of respeccing is only a tiny change that wont effect raiding in a negative way at all. The Server will benefit from it. You can change speccs for PVP for example. You could even try out some new speccs from time to time. I do think that it wont be a big change in the vanilla experience. There is probably no argument you can bring up except: "thats not how it was in retail". I only played Classic WoW my hole life because everything else was just not good imo. So I am not pro transmog or pro dungeon finder or whatever they implemented at 2.0. But I do think that this small change will effect the server community in a positive way.
- kdfssl
- Sergeant
Re: Please do not answer with a simple no.
Simple argument:
Classic WoW was about compromise and diversity of classes and abilities.
If you wanted a spec that performs well in a pve setting, you go with that spec. If you wanted a pvp spec, you go with that one. No player should have the optimum spec all the time in all situations, because then every player would be the same more or less (when it comes to classes).
If 5g respecs came about, every battleground would be soul link warlocks, deep frost mages, cb/prep rogues, etc. there would be zero diversity. Private servers have a reputation of having many tryhards/min maxers, and if the barrier to change was so low, you'd see people flaming each other constantly over their spec choice ("wow another fucking prot warrior, can't you fucking respec?")
With respec costs as is, we see multiple different specs from all classes in BGs, which adds more diversity to a game that has become, in today's standards, increasingly homogenized (which is bad in my opinion, you're entitled to think otherwise)
Classic WoW was about compromise and diversity of classes and abilities.
If you wanted a spec that performs well in a pve setting, you go with that spec. If you wanted a pvp spec, you go with that one. No player should have the optimum spec all the time in all situations, because then every player would be the same more or less (when it comes to classes).
If 5g respecs came about, every battleground would be soul link warlocks, deep frost mages, cb/prep rogues, etc. there would be zero diversity. Private servers have a reputation of having many tryhards/min maxers, and if the barrier to change was so low, you'd see people flaming each other constantly over their spec choice ("wow another fucking prot warrior, can't you fucking respec?")
With respec costs as is, we see multiple different specs from all classes in BGs, which adds more diversity to a game that has become, in today's standards, increasingly homogenized (which is bad in my opinion, you're entitled to think otherwise)
<GRIZZLY>
- nervous
- Knight-Lieutenant
Re: Please do not answer with a simple no.
After reading too many retarted suggestions here is mine: ban for lyfe these filthy scrubs 
You come to blizzlike server, that should be copy of the game that was back in 2005. now fucking deal with it and stop posting retarted stuff...
You come to blizzlike server, that should be copy of the game that was back in 2005. now fucking deal with it and stop posting retarted stuff...
-
Shirley
- Senior Sergeant
Re: Please do not answer with a simple no.
1 po symbolic for the respe !
I need play moonkin in pve and feral for pvp
I need play moonkin in pve and feral for pvp
- Hanodain
- Private
21 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3