Page 1 of 2

Black Lotus

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 7:20 am
by justclassic
Hey ,

Black lotus should be soulbound.
I know that it would hurt the traders and all the raiding guilds in some way but it simply was like that up to 1.7 .

http://wowwiki.wikia.com/Black_Lotus

If you scroll down to patch changes you can see it. Also the official patch notes of 1.7 have it listed to be no longer soulbound.

Re: Make black lotus soulbound

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:45 pm
by Bioness
No.

Re: Make black lotus soulbound

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:16 pm
by justclassic
Bioness wrote:No.


Elaborate please ?!

Isn't blizzlike the way it should be ?

Re: Black Lotus

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 4:55 pm
by bobmasculo
Eaa make the flask cost from 150g .. 500g!!

Re: Black Lotus

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:18 pm
by Cwasm
Bioness responds to every suggestion with "No" until he gets banned.

Black Lotus was indeed soulbound until 1.7 with Zul'gurub.

Re: Black Lotus

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:33 pm
by justclassic
bobmasculo wrote:Eaa make the flask cost from 150g .. 500g!!


We never had flasks in mc or zg back in the days. Maybe the tanks, but dps didn't cause it was too expensive.

Re: Black Lotus

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:43 am
by Bioness
Cwasm wrote:Bioness responds to every suggestion with "No" until he gets banned.

Black Lotus was indeed soulbound until 1.7 with Zul'gurub.


I only use "No" when the suggestion is absurd. Certain things do not deserve to be Blizzlike, this and that "make Light's Hope the wildwest" suggestion are prime examples of things that need not be changed.

You know what else was Blizzlike and Nostalrius went directly against it? Warlocks being able to have both Master Demonologist and the Demonic Sacrifice buff through "clever use of game mechanics".

So there is my fucking elaboration on why I said "No".

Re: Black Lotus

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2015 4:37 am
by Aunstic
Bioness wrote:So there is my fucking elaboration on why I said "No".

Image

Re: Black Lotus

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:19 am
by justclassic
Bioness wrote:
You know what else was Blizzlike and Nostalrius went directly against it? Warlocks being able to have both Master Demonologist and the Demonic Sacrifice buff through "clever use of game mechanics".

So there is my fucking elaboration on why I said "No".


I don't think that is a valid argument as nostalrius always said that talents and how they work would be 1.12 and the "clever use of game mechanics" you mentioned was fixed in 1.12 .

Re: Black Lotus

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:21 am
by Bioness
justclassic wrote:
Bioness wrote:
You know what else was Blizzlike and Nostalrius went directly against it? Warlocks being able to have both Master Demonologist and the Demonic Sacrifice buff through "clever use of game mechanics".

So there is my fucking elaboration on why I said "No".


I don't think that is a valid argument as nostalrius always said that talents and how they work would be 1.12 and the "clever use of game mechanics" you mentioned was fixed in 1.12 .


I'm not speaking from a purity stand point like most of the people scream "IT NOT BRIZLIEK", I speak from a logical one. So tell me what point would there be in making Black Lotus soulbound now? The only thing it being soulbound caused was ridiculous flask prices and forcing people to be both a Herbalist and an Alchemist. But sure why not, all for the sake of "authenticity", reason be damn!