Page 1 of 3

Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 6:27 am
by iheartbenben
http://www.strawpoll.me/3875603

Please give your opinion on the state of /world as of the 15th of March, 2015 by voting on this poll.

Adminstration/GM's/Nostalrius, please see the amount of discontent in your player base being caused by a small, select group of people with ill intentions.

http://www.strawpoll.me/3875603

EDIT : RESPONSE FROM <GM>KRAFT SS's BELOW on March 16th[/u][/b]

Reply from <GM>Kraft concerning the poll. Admin wants to see more votes on the poll before they respond. Please do your part, voting either way for or against, and tell your in game friends to vote. I cannot keep the poll open for much longer and it still be valid, 72 hours or so more.

VERBATIM : <GM>Kraft stated that "If this gets a significant amount of votes, I think the admins might consider doing it. Right now, it's <500. 1,000+ votes is a must. If you want to message me further, you can do it on the forums.

http://s2.postimg.org/7zex2xmft/New_Bitmap_Image.png

[img=http://s14.postimg.org/rabgh5zyl/New_Bitmap_Image.jpg]

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 6:34 am
by The Shortest Path
Alternately, stop spamming and whining about it.

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 6:51 am
by iheartbenben
The Shortest Path wrote:Alternately, stop spamming and whining about it.


So toxic.

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:35 am
by Fraxx
i think the poll needed some adjustment

http://strawpoll.me/3875841

*EDIT* i don't know how that is a toxic comment... i'd rather say all the whining about /world is toxic when there is a unmoderated LFG chat

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:45 am
by iheartbenben
Fraxx wrote:i think the poll needed some adjustment

http://strawpoll.me/3875841


Another toxic comment. How do you respond to the people?

As of 2:30 am US CENTRAL on March 15, 2015.

1. Yes, GM's should control moderation.
18 votes (38%)

2. No, Player's should control moderation.
12 votes (25%)

3. Nor, there should be only /say timers (one /world say per 15 seconds)
10 votes (21%)

4. Neither, there should be NO moderation.
8 votes (17%)



Let's have a civil discussion if you are capable of doing so.

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:01 am
by iheartbenben
As of 3:00 am US CENTRAL on March 15, 2015


1. Yes, GM's should control moderation.
22 votes (39%)

2. Nor, there should be only /say timers (one /world say per 15 seconds)
13 votes (23%)

3. No, Player's should control moderation.
12 votes (21%)

4. Neither, there should be NO moderation.
10 votes (18%)

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 10:07 pm
by iheartbenben
As of 5 PM US CENTRAL on March 15th, 2015.


1. Yes, GM's should control moderation.
114 votes (48%)

2. Neither, there should be NO moderation.
48 votes (20%)

3. Nor, there should be only /say timers (one /world say per 15 seconds)
42 votes (18%)

4. No, Player's should control moderation.
36 votes (15%)

Let's please have a discussion about this, both players and Nostalrius admin.

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:03 pm
by ouloph
its fine as is, as we have all just seen, this jackass has been spamming it for quite sometime and player mod has been able to ban your stupid L1 trolls everytime. the only change I can see that /world needs is a level limit. like say 10.

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:16 pm
by iheartbenben
ouloph wrote:its fine as is, as we have all just seen, this jackass has been spamming it for quite sometime and player mod has been able to ban your stupid L1 trolls everytime. the only change I can see that /world needs is a level limit. like say 10.


SO you say it's fine, so can you answer how you justify the reasons for ban below?


What happens when "they" ban a player for improper punctuation?

Foreign Language?

Guild recruitment?

Party recruitment?

What about when they consistently ban entire groups of the same players, time after time without provocation or cause?

Is this fine too?

Re: Vote on /World's Future

PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:43 pm
by Linc
Shutdown /World & /Global to end all those discussions about it.

/Join LookingForGroup

You all wanted Blizzlike... Deal with it!