Battlegrounds below 51

[Mulen]

so yeah shortly after the server was released i suggested that we could queue up for pvp everywhere in the world..
some people said no.. and flamed me because it was not 100% blizzlike and what not..
and i agree.. it is not 100% blizzlike
people even said that with our amount of players it would be no problem joining a bg quite fast..
so did people actually join a bg fast?

I remember being in a queue for more than 2.5 hours and ended up in an AB that ended after a min or so because of too few players..

so.. wouldent it be better if people were able to queue up from the world than having no BGs at all..



ps.. even as level 60 you would face less premades if you actually were able to join those BGs from everywhere.

let the non-blizzlike hate begin

[Macalister]

Lets implement the command!

http://strawpoll.me/4115205

[Mugo]

I vote for it. Yes, 3.4 hours for a 2 minute BG isn't even fun... It's like torture.

[Xylon666Darkstar]

Yes. Simply because this is a QoL change that would benefit BGs health. On the flip side though, May lead to WPVP death, and/or people dodging into bgs to avoid dying in wpvp.

[DrunkenEnvy]

They just need to fix the quest that gives XP (and I think $) for WSG, and make it repeatable like it should be.

[Mulen]

NO.. no exp for pvping!
Thats not what this post is about.. it is about making it easier for people to do battlegrounds.. not to make them more rewarding !

[DrunkenEnvy]

NO.. no exp for pvping!
Thats not what this post is about.. it is about making it easier for people to do battlegrounds.. not to make them more rewarding !

It's not a suggestion or a debate. BG marks should be exchangeable for XP. I thought the point of your post was to make BGs more popular?

[Mulen]

My post is about making it more attractive.. but i would never go as far to make a bg give you exp.. pvp should be rewardig adrenaline only !