Ultima wrote:guildchat or not, it should be punished imo
and if you think different it seems you are a racist too..
|
Aunstic wrote:Note: THIS IS GCHAT, AN UNMODERATED CHAT BY GAMEMASTERS. YOU HAVE THE OPTION TO LEAVE THE GUILD, KICK THE GUILDMATE, OR IGNORE THE PARTIES AT WILL.
Why do people insist on making every-fucking-thing GM moderated when you are choosing to be in the guild or not kick the members of the guild. Have you even spoke to the officers of the guild to form a complaint?
There is no "forcing" if you ignore the people inviting you. If the guild uses multiple people to spam invite you, submit a ticket because that is considered harassment. If you stay in the guild, you are choosing to join them. Simple. As. That.
nervous wrote:Garithos did nothing wrong
|
sloasdaylight wrote:Aunstic wrote:Note: THIS IS GCHAT, AN UNMODERATED CHAT BY GAMEMASTERS. YOU HAVE THE OPTION TO LEAVE THE GUILD, KICK THE GUILDMATE, OR IGNORE THE PARTIES AT WILL.
Why do people insist on making every-fucking-thing GM moderated when you are choosing to be in the guild or not kick the members of the guild. Have you even spoke to the officers of the guild to form a complaint?
There is no "forcing" if you ignore the people inviting you. If the guild uses multiple people to spam invite you, submit a ticket because that is considered harassment. If you stay in the guild, you are choosing to join them. Simple. As. That.
That depends very much on the Nos terms of use. If the guild is violating those, then action can be taken. You have no right to free speech on this server, only what the server admins allow you to have.
|
Aunstic wrote:Don't give me this freedom of speech throwaway statement. Ilovebenben received a message from a GM stating that they do not and will not moderate private channels because the issues can be taken up from the owner/mods (or guild master/officers) of the channel. /world might be a justification if the 500 votes are pushed through on Ilovebenben's strawpoll due to one of the GMs stating that he needed 500 more votes for the poll to become effective and deviate from this unspoken rule.
Read up on the forum a bit and stop using throwaway statements.
|
Ancestor wrote:Aunstic wrote:Don't give me this freedom of speech throwaway statement. Ilovebenben received a message from a GM stating that they do not and will not moderate private channels because the issues can be taken up from the owner/mods (or guild master/officers) of the channel. /world might be a justification if the 500 votes are pushed through on Ilovebenben's strawpoll due to one of the GMs stating that he needed 500 more votes for the poll to become effective and deviate from this unspoken rule.
Read up on the forum a bit and stop using throwaway statements.
Which side are you defending? Like, you're ragging on both belligerents.
|
Aunstic wrote:You have freedom of speech in the private channels because you have the choice to leave if you're a visitor or kick/ban if you're a moderator/owner or guild master/officer. You will not have freedom of speech in world if it becomes a server channel instead of a private, player-managed channel.
|