by Fear3d » Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:35 am
It looks like the GM in question is no longer a GM, so why is everyone crying so much? A different GM has made it clear to you that GMs are monitored for abuse of power and dealt with accordingly. Accept that and move on. You aren't entitled to the details of such cases. When have you ever seen Blizzard admins make a post on some forums to say "GM X has been fired as a GM because we caught him abusing his powers!"? You haven't, and it doesn't mean that no Blizzard GM ever abused their powers. It also doesn't mean that they didn't fire GMs when it happened. Simply put, the details of such situations aren't your business. All you need to know is that it's not allowed and such situations are dealt with.
I've been in management for about a decade, and I've had to fire people for various reasons. When that happens, it's generally against company policy to go blabbing about the details of the situation to customers or even to other employees. It's simply not something you do. There's no reason why this should be any different.
Also, to those of you crying about logs. In no way does Tadbouche's picture suggest that this server doesn't keep logs of commands that GMs use. In fact, I'd say that the opposite is true. It seems pretty clear that the GM was able to locate the log of the situation, because he knew which GM banned the account. All he said is that the reason for the ban wasn't available. That could simply mean that the GM that banned him didn't list a reason. This server is based on a modified version of Mangos, and Mangos has multiple logging systems implemented (including one that logs all GM commands used), so there is no reason to doubt that they are capable of tracking their GMs' actions.