Clarification On Non-Blizzlike Policy Of Nostalrius

[Lakweeta]

I have messaged viper and raazi about this 2 DAYS ago and have gotten no reply.
I was told the next time I kill a quest NPC (more specifically guard thomas) I would recieve a suspension.
I may have found another bug and that is where it says PvP next to the server name.
I am done playing on this server untill viper and raazi get back to me on how they changed this from a PvP server to a Normal/PvE server.
There are better games to spend my time on if this is how the staff is going to act, so untill im fucking allowed to kill enemy NPCs without getting BANNED im done with this server.
False advertisement on release schedule and now false advertisement on the server type.

Good Riddance, no one is going to miss you.

Blizzard has ALWAYS shamed/warned>banned players who continually camp low level quest hubs/NPCs.
It's very Blizz-Like, go ruin some other game. c:

[tuck3r]

I would like to see proof of blizzard banning players PRE-BC for killing the enemy factions NPCs on a PvP server.

[Terranaut]

I am done playing on this server

I made an account just to say good fucking riddance, get lost and never come back

[Erka]

What a day to be alive !
Could we have this guy banned from the forums too, and get rid of the idiocy for good ?

[Lakweeta]

Here's a nifty quote.

"If you do it long enough, it's considered griefing, and that's against what you click 'accept' for after every patch.
So yes, Blizz can choose the banhammer. And don't forget that Blizz reserves the right to punish anyone for anything and nothing with anything from a warning to a permanent ban."

You'll find proof on google with simple searches.

[Antipatra]

I would like to see proof of blizzard banning players PRE-BC for killing the enemy factions NPCs on a PvP server.

"Find me evidence from 10 years ago"

Really? Ok, this is about all I could find;

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2 ... gysection2

June 2006 article, BC being launched in 2007;

"Many players also want a say in determining what behaviour is acceptable. Although Blizzard, the makers of World of Warcraft, reacted to griefing by banning more than 5,400 accounts in April, this is not a cost-effective way of moderating the world they have created."

Not that I care, but here it is.

[tuck3r]

Show me proof of them banning a single player for killing the opposite factions NPC on a PvP server pre burning crusade.
You cant do it.

[Lakweeta]

I would like to see proof of blizzard banning players PRE-BC for killing the enemy factions NPCs on a PvP server.

"Find me evidence from 10 years ago"

Really? Ok, this is about all I could find;

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2 ... gysection2

June 2006 article, BC being launched in 2007;

"Many players also want a say in determining what behaviour is acceptable. Although Blizzard, the makers of World of Warcraft, reacted to griefing by banning more than 5,400 accounts in April, this is not a cost-effective way of moderating the world they have created."

Not that I care, but here it is.

Wham Bam, that's a thank ya' ma'am c:

So in short, stop doing it. You were warned!

[tuck3r]

Wham Bam, that's a thank ya' ma'am c:

So in short, stop doing it. You were warned!

Thats not proof of them banning for killing NPCs on a PvP server, you would think somebody would have made a thread complaining about getting banned for that but yet you cant find one.

[Lakweeta]

Wham Bam, that's a thank ya' ma'am c:

So in short, stop doing it. You were warned!

Thats not proof of them banning for killing NPCs on a PvP server.

How is it not? They were banned for griefing from killing NPCs and such.

But whatever, you were warned so ya' need to stop . Go grief some other server :3