Krusher wrote:The terms of use is pretty straight forward in cases as these.
Common sense & use of language determin the result.
If the barrens chat should be clear of all rules (like people act now) that would spread across the server.
Again;
Any form of racism, hate speech, pornogrpahic content and the likes of either are not allowed.
Use barrens chat "as the barrens chat" and not as a feclal matter distribution channel.
I know very well that barrens chat always takes it a bit further and GM's are around to draw the line.
Obviously we don't know the details of this dispute, so yes, it is up to the GMs to police this kind of thing.
But I don't know about this "spreading across the server" from what I've seen only the barrens has this "problem."
Yet, again, we see a subjective problem, some people think this kind of speech is ok, otherwise they wouldn't do it. Again, its up to the GMs to choose what stays and what goes, I just hope it's handled fairly.
I've seen many a oversensitive person on the internet nowadays, and these loose rules just get me jittery is all. I like to be able to voice my opinion and have it be challenged if need be. I'm not afraid to re-examine my beliefs.
The only choice anyone here really has is to trust the GM's judgement, or go find another server unfortunately :\
Unless there's an appeals board on the forum I'm not aware of?
Edit:
Wagnard wrote:My guild talks about GM Pottu all of the time. He's kind of stupid, and his actions shouldn't be treated as representative of the rest of the GM team. Pottu can be helpful, but he's more disruptive than helpful most of the time.
It upsets me that the GMs choose to keep the guy, whose clearly a Social Justice Warrior.
Some more from glorious Pottu:
I don't like passing judgement too quickly on a person, got any more images of pottu? Maybe there should be a thread for all messages people have received from GMs.