MerlinAlive wrote:Alright, you prove that you created the account (let's stick with that), but you didn't prove the ownership.
If the account was sold, the GM's don't help with getting the account back from a scammer, they just helped scamming somebody else.
And that's why i stated they can't help (or know for sure if it was help).
The only way to prohibit the "A GM helped me scam somebody" - thing is to delegate the security of an account to the owner, and that's what they did.
Since account selling is against the ToU, I'd prefer the GMs prioritized restoring original ownership instead of worrying about some hypothetical account transfer. That would help deter account selling, since you would always run the risk of someone taking their account back. If you could prove someone sold their account, it should be banned. However, that's very different than the current stance (at least how it appears to me from reading this forum) of assuming that any hacked account is the result of a voluntary transfer or account sale.
At the end of the day, shit can happen and you can wind up with a compromised account (I'm not saying that's necessarily what happened with the OP). Fortunately, it hasn't happened to me but I can certainly empathize with many of the people that lose their accounts. It's unfortunate that this server takes the unique (as far as I know) stance of refusing to even consider supporting those cases. In the early days of this server's release, the argument against item/character restoration was solely that it would be unfair to previous cases that were denied, and now it's developed into this "we don't care, it's your own fault" attitude. It's very reminiscent of a certain other server that had the same mentality and got away with it due to the large population base, and is paying for it now that their population has dwindled more than 50-fold.