kinda worried about pvp

[sempiternus]

Basically :
- less population
- pve server = proportionally less pvp players

Do you think the pvp aspect of the game will be ok on the pve server?

[BoxerBriefly]

Yes.

[Xarizma]

yeah will be absolutely fine

[twinkpvp]

less players=easy to rank up
less players=slow pve progression=less op pve gear
less players=less hardcore guilds/players doing premades
less players=less players doing low lv bgs

[Shadowpve]

Pretty sure it will be fine, only time will tell tho.

[MrDiap]

PvP server right next door there ==>

Edit: I found it rather amusing to see the topic "kinda worried about pvp" in the carebear's heaven.

[blix]

I think people will pvp at 60. At low level most people dont want to spend the time to go into town and queue up, then do a bg, then go back to where they were questing. Plus, there's no gear from the battleground quartermasters yet.

Just had a 10-19 wsg with 5 ppl on each side. Estimated wait said 50 minutes, but the queue was maybe 10 for me. Probably won't spend my time doing more since they don't give exp.

[sempiternus]

Well, i guess only time will tell : i only hope alterac valley won't be empty when we go there

[Azgabast]

Basically :
- less population
- pve server = proportionally less pvp players

Do you think the pvp aspect of the game will be ok on the pve server?

I'm sure it will be just fine, just fewer battlegrounds than on the pvp server. If the 2500 player cap is blizzlike, then so should the amount of pvp on a pve server, neh?

[Hawksworth]

I played on a low pop rp realm back in vanilla and even there, there was plenty of battleground action. I used to level mainly through bg's. Lot's of people who enjoy pvp still want the option of questing/pve in peace so with the population as good as it has been I'm guessing that will be the case here.