That would be a mistake...

Discussion forum related to Nostalrius Begins in general.

That would be a mistake...

by Tactician » Fri Apr 08, 2016 4:48 pm

Hey guys,

Releasing the source code of Nostalrius online would be a big mistake. Everyone, and i mean almost everyone will step up and try to "revive" Nostalrius. We don't need 100 different servers with names like: Nostalrius Continues, Nostalrius Revive, Nostalrius V2 etc... because this will happen once the code is released.

Instead could you please give it to someone who's really interested and capable of maintaining this code? Pretty sure many ppl will abuse the name "Nostalrius" with theirs crappy servers.

This must not happen, really!
Last edited by Tactician on Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Tactician
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by Alarac25 » Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:02 pm

That is the point, it starts a wildfire. Makes it so the server because it will become legion
Alarac25
Private
Private
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by Gray9010 » Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:06 pm

After this happened with TPB, it didn't work out. There was a spam of bad clones, clones that had viruses, clones that were exploitative, etc. I'd really prefer an official "successor" to migrate to.
Gray9010
Private
Private
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by EinBaum » Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:08 pm

No, it is good.

Survival of the fittest.
User avatar
EinBaum
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by PeaceHammer » Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:49 pm

I dunno. I think I'd prefer Nostalrius release the code to maybe 3 projects at the most. One's that have a decent reputation. It's gonna be a clusterfuck of clones if everyone gets the code.
User avatar
PeaceHammer
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by Lionheart » Fri Apr 08, 2016 5:51 pm

EinBaum wrote: Survival of the fittest.


I agree
Lionheart
Private
Private
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by winfernal » Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:06 pm

The most important thing is that it can handle a nostalrius size of player amount. I don't think many servers are capeable of that.
Winfernal - 60 Orc Warrior (PvP)
Torghatten - 60 Gnome Mage (PvP)
Razà - 60 Undead Rogue (PvP)

R.I.P ^
winfernal
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by ceoddyn » Fri Apr 08, 2016 6:42 pm

completely agree with the point about what happened when tpb tried this. survival of the fittest only applies if there is actual competition and not just an open scam fest. we'll be LUCKY if there is even one other team that will just appear out of the blue with even half the quality of nost

case point: we dont want different kinds of vanilla wow, we want vanilla wow. i want whoever can make that one thing best to be the one making it, i dont want anybody else making it, specially not blizzard any longer
ceoddyn
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by Gehere » Fri Apr 08, 2016 8:03 pm

ceoddyn wrote: we'll be LUCKY if there is even one other team that will just appear out of the blue with even half the quality of nost

case point: we dont want different kinds of vanilla wow, we want vanilla wow. i want whoever can make that one thing best to be the one making it, i dont want anybody else making it, specially not blizzard any longer



Luck just struck.

There is one place - to where you should refer...

www.vanilla.re

Go look. Read. And make your own opinion. This place - will be home.
Gehere
Grunt
Grunt
 

Re: That would be a mistake...

by HeloGoodbye » Fri Apr 08, 2016 8:05 pm

Gehere wrote:
ceoddyn wrote: we'll be LUCKY if there is even one other team that will just appear out of the blue with even half the quality of nost

case point: we dont want different kinds of vanilla wow, we want vanilla wow. i want whoever can make that one thing best to be the one making it, i dont want anybody else making it, specially not blizzard any longer



Luck just struck.

There is one place - to where you should refer...

http://www.vanilla.re

Go look. Read. And make your own opinion. This place - will be home.


stop spamming you illiterate fuck.
Vanilla.re is WACK

Re: Vanilla RE

by EinBaum » Fri Apr 08, 2016 8:01 pm
Simple website template, empty forum, empty claims with no proof and bad english.

Forget it, it's trash.
User avatar
HeloGoodbye
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Next

Return to General discussion