slipryy wrote:classic dr. autism thread
lmao
slipryy wrote:classic dr. autism thread
euronmisc wrote:Language really isn't as nice and regular as you'd like it to be, however your conclusion is more or less correct. It's mostly convenience, and there is nothing wrong with that. Ambiguity and irregularities are okay, and the magical part is that we still understand each other perfectly fine.
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
Dr. Doom wrote:
If talking about him on third person, I always refer to his last name.
Same with a Magistrate, Parlamentarian, etc. "I heard from Johnson/Cameron/Dobbs..." etc.
Imagine me telling you "So I saw Deputy and he was talking to..."
|
![]() |
Dr. Doom wrote:Dr. Doom wrote:
If talking about him on third person, I always refer to his last name.
Same with a Magistrate, Parlamentarian, etc. "I heard from Johnson/Cameron/Dobbs..." etc.
Imagine me telling you "So I saw Deputy and he was talking to..."
Uzephi wrote:Dr. Doom wrote:Dr. Doom wrote:
If talking about him on third person, I always refer to his last name.
Same with a Magistrate, Parlamentarian, etc. "I heard from Johnson/Cameron/Dobbs..." etc.
Imagine me telling you "So I saw Deputy and he was talking to..."
"God save the Queen" not "God save Elizabeth II". I barely ever see royalty regarded without their title and only if you talk to someone from a different country do they use names instead of status. Most other countries don't change leaders once every few years, unlike the US with their electoral system every 4(look how long the Queen has been the monarch). This is why they have a habit of saying the title instead of name when talking in third person.