by Drain » Fri Apr 22, 2016 8:08 am
They wouldn't have to see any of that go though. This isn't a "one or the other" situation. Newer patches would still be running, and players happy to sit alone in their garrison playing Facebook aps could continue right on doing that. No one is trying to get retail newer patches shutdown. We're just trying to get "all" patches hosted so players have the choice to play what they want, something you'd think should already be common sense in the first place. Blizzard, so long as they're hosting WoW, should host all patches of it. They still run Warcraft 3 servers, a game that was out for years before WoW even was. They don't do anymore balance patching or hack control... but the servers still technically run, meaning it's more supported than any older WoW patch, and that's pretty damn dumb when WoW has a paying sub they could have been cashing every year.
Every patch should have a nice group of servers for it, and if they did, they'd see millions of reactivated accounts paying a sub again. One way transfers up would allow players to progress at their own rate, meaning they'd probably stay even longer. But instead, Blizzard wants you to do the opposite of what would make them more money, which is to skip almost all content ever created, rushing straight to the end, then exhausting it almost as quickly.