ShaqPack wrote:
They've announced plenty of other games at Blizzcon.... and in fact have pretty much done so since the whole thing began. Technically all of these games are competition for WoW because the player can choose to play those instead. The only difference here is that they'd still be announcing a version of wow and they'd still be making money from subscriptions.
I don't understand your point about "other games." I'm saying they need to focus on Legion's future. This is NOT the time to announce Legacy (if it ever is for them) because Legion is fresh out less than 3 months and is doing very well. If they announce Legacy servers it will detract from any other Legion information and the media and playerbase will view that as "Looks like Legion is going to suck too." In case you don't watch Blizzcon frequently, they have different panels and announcements for each game. If they DID discuss Legacy, it would step all over Legion, which is a very bad idea and totally unfair to what has so far been an amazing bounce back expansion.
The game has been a disaster without legacy servers numerous times in the past, so I don't think anyone honestly believes that if blizzard allocates a very small amount of it's resources to a legacy server, that it is somehow going to "sink the ship".
"Disaster" is an overly strong and clearly biased word choice. WoD was a massive disappointment, but at no point has anything been disastrous about World of Warcraft for anyone but confused casuals. The expansions still sell millions of copies and even if the population dips to 1m subs, that's more than enough for the game to carry on, as seen with the meager thousands here that made the servers unbelievably packed.
I DO think people feel that way about Legacy though, because I have spoken at length to people in my guild about it. All but a few of them would even be interested in Legacy even with the expansion ideas in mind, and coming off how poorly WoD was done, its very important the focus remain on Legion and Legion only.
In fact legacy servers stand to be one of the few things that can stop players from unsubbing during said content droughts. Speaking of which, we generally see after 2 or 3 months of a new expansion, people begin to unsub. So that drought will take a lot less than a year to arrive. The only difference is a few months later, the game will have life again for a few months, and then revert back to drought status.... until the final tier of Legion, where we will see another year long drought again.
I totally agree, Legacy would be the best thing the game could do for those times where the final patch is out for WAY too long.
People do begin to unsub after a few months, but that has nothing to do with a content drought. I mean we are coming up on 3 months in and we just received a massive new non-raid patch. And there is still another 10 boss raid to come in early 2017. The "Drought" refers to the end of the expansion, and it occurs when the development cycle is finished for the current expansion, but the development team is working on the next expansion so heavily. Inevitably, said expansion gets pushed back and we end up playing through the same raid for a year plus. This is AT LEAST one full year away, as we still don't have Nighthold out, and that will be at least 3-4 months. There will be a second tier after that, which should last 6-8 months, and THEN the final tier will come out. If that IS the last patch, the "drought" wouldn't set in until at least 3+ months into that tier, so likely some time in 2018.
There is no such thing as a content drought in the middle of an expansion though. That is just people being casuals and not actually playing the game. A vast majority of people do not finish the content the patch has to offer while its current.
As for players coming back to blizzard games, it only makes sense. All they do nowadays is advertise their other games lol. WoW has lost tens of millions of players over the years due to a variety of reason.... suddenly if a lot of those people had a chance to play their favorite version again, they'd be interested. From there it makes sense that some of them would be checking out the other games as well. At the very least, the free stuff like Hots.
I just don't think so man. If Nostalrius could only generate 300k~ signatures, how many people would actually return? I really think it would be less than a million. I'd love to see it happen for sure, but I'm really cautious to say that it will fix all the problems for Blizzard. Honestly, it seems like it would be a massive undertaking for them, and its not likely to go over well for people who currently have no interest. Vanilla and old versions of WoW are very confusing to players who have recently joined and I seriously think it could do more harm than good for the current playerbase. I have brought a lot of people to Classic and TBC emulation over the years that have never played it. Even on high rate servers they don't understand why it takes so long to level, and many of their favorite classes either don't exist or are a complete joke. One of my longest friends in WoW is a huge fan of Retribution paladin, but obviously was horribly disheartened to hear that in Classic they were basically unplayable. Try explaining that to some one who has never played the game during Classic. "Ya sorry buddy, Blizzard was really bad at balancing back then. But trust me, this version of the game is way more fun!"
I'll maintain that the best thing that can possibly happen is Blizzard endorsing Nostalrius. The one thing that I know Blizzard has that Nostalrius doesn't is stable servers and proper customer support.
If there was a way to get that from Blizzard but let the Nostalrius guys develop the game as they please, it would be a win win in my book.
Something officially support that I could stream and make videos on to play when there is down periods in Legion, but something that I know is ran by people who truly know what Classic is all about and want nothing more than to deliver that again.