Of course, it's the truest form of democracy. Democracy by consensus.Xaverius wrote:There'S too many of these projects ven when we're talking about opensource :p.
Someone has an idea, they pitch it to whichever community they're part of. It's rejected, so they branch to their own project and implement their own idea. Some people might follow them and in time they might even be more popular than the original community project.
Over time you have a mix of fragmented projects, some active, some inactive. You can't force someone to close their project and you can't prevent someone forking and going their own way. But you can see which project(s) have the most active developers and probably you could say they have some consensus. Or, you join one that suits your own ideas regardless of activity. It's down to you.