Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than names?

Discussion forum related to Nostalrius Begins in general.

Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than names?

by Dr. Doom » Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:45 pm

'Princess' is how both Moira Bronzebeard in BRD and Theradras in Maraudon are known.
Thaurissan is referred to as 'Emp/Emperor' as well. And we can go on listing. Rivendare is 'Baron' (just like Baron Longshore in Barrens coincidentially), Lashlayer is 'Broodlord'. Or the worst of all that, 'domo, from Majordomo Executus. With 4.2 Firelands, Staghelm also got to earn the same silly nomenclature.

Only notable exceptions are the titled Generals. Drakkisath, Angerforge or Rajaxx.


It has been this way, but why? Does anyone ever talk about Draghi by starting with "ECB Chairman said" ? Probably not.

Why are game names then used like this?
Sheer lazyness, first thing I read, first thing I spout?
User avatar
Dr. Doom
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

by Botmaster5 » Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:23 pm

because titles are earned and deserve respect

you don't call a doctor by his first name, do you?
<Titans of War> Xashe
"Behold those who have power, and who are not afraid to wield it. Behold... the warlocks!" - Gul'dan
User avatar
Botmaster5
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

by Dr. Doom » Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:26 pm

Botmaster5 wrote:because titles are earned and deserve respect

you don't call a doctor by his first name, do you?


If talking about him on third person, I always refer to his last name.
Same with a Magistrate, Parlamentarian, etc. "I heard from Johnson/Cameron/Dobbs..." etc.
Imagine me telling you "So I saw Deputy and he was talking to..."
User avatar
Dr. Doom
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

by Lifealert » Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:48 pm

Theyre easier to say. Lashlayer has too many syllables.
Image
User avatar
Lifealert
Stone Guard
Stone Guard
 

Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

by EinBaum » Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:56 pm

People use the name that is easiest to type & remember while not being ambiguous. So you can't say "Major" or "General" because noone will understand what you mean.
User avatar
EinBaum
Sergeant
Sergeant
 

Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

by euronmisc » Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:08 pm

Honestly, this is a broad generalisation you're making that has a lot of exceptions, even after eluding all the generals.

See;
-Mandokir over Bloodlord
-Wyrm over Overlord
-Gand over Darkmaster
-Sartura over Battleguard
-Huhu over Princess
-Kri over Lord
-Yauj over Princess

I'm not sure about the ones in Naxx since I've never really been there, but I highely doubt people would be talking about the Grand Widow over just Faerlina, and so on.

Language really isn't as nice and regular as you'd like it to be, however your conclusion is more or less correct. It's mostly convenience, and there is nothing wrong with that. Ambiguity and irregularities are okay, and the magical part is that we still understand each other perfectly fine.
euronmisc
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 

Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

by slipryy » Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:45 pm

classic dr. autism thread
slipryy
Senior Sergeant
Senior Sergeant
 

Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

by Dr. Doom » Wed Apr 06, 2016 12:38 am

Undertanker wrote:
slipryy wrote:classic dr. autism thread


:)


Why is it funny? I take interest in the way you people speak.
User avatar
Dr. Doom
Knight-Lieutenant
Knight-Lieutenant
 

Next

Return to General discussion