Page 1 of 3
Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than names?

Posted:
Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:45 pm
by Dr. Doom
'Princess' is how both Moira Bronzebeard in BRD and Theradras in Maraudon are known.
Thaurissan is referred to as 'Emp/Emperor' as well. And we can go on listing. Rivendare is 'Baron' (just like Baron Longshore in Barrens coincidentially), Lashlayer is 'Broodlord'. Or the worst of all that, 'domo, from Majordomo Executus. With 4.2 Firelands, Staghelm also got to earn the same silly nomenclature.
Only notable exceptions are the titled Generals. Drakkisath, Angerforge or Rajaxx.
It has been this way, but why? Does anyone ever talk about Draghi by starting with "ECB Chairman said" ? Probably not.
Why are game names then used like this?
Sheer lazyness, first thing I read, first thing I spout?
Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:23 pm
by Botmaster5
because titles are earned and deserve respect
you don't call a doctor by his first name, do you?
Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:26 pm
by Dr. Doom
Botmaster5 wrote:because titles are earned and deserve respect
you don't call a doctor by his first name, do you?
If talking about him on third person, I always refer to his last name.
Same with a Magistrate, Parlamentarian, etc. "I heard from Johnson/Cameron/Dobbs..." etc.
Imagine me telling you "So I saw Deputy and he was talking to..."
Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Tue Apr 05, 2016 6:48 pm
by Lifealert
Theyre easier to say. Lashlayer has too many syllables.
Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Tue Apr 05, 2016 7:56 pm
by EinBaum
People use the name that is easiest to type & remember while not being ambiguous. So you can't say "Major" or "General" because noone will understand what you mean.
Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:34 pm
by Yeanahaye
go outside
Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:08 pm
by euronmisc
Honestly, this is a broad generalisation you're making that has a lot of exceptions, even after eluding all the generals.
See;
-Mandokir over Bloodlord
-Wyrm over Overlord
-Gand over Darkmaster
-Sartura over Battleguard
-Huhu over Princess
-Kri over Lord
-Yauj over Princess
I'm not sure about the ones in Naxx since I've never really been there, but I highely doubt people would be talking about the Grand Widow over just Faerlina, and so on.
Language really isn't as nice and regular as you'd like it to be, however your conclusion is more or less correct. It's mostly convenience, and there is nothing wrong with that. Ambiguity and irregularities are okay, and the magical part is that we still understand each other perfectly fine.
Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:45 pm
by slipryy
classic dr. autism thread
Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Wed Apr 06, 2016 12:32 am
by Undertanker
slipryy wrote:classic dr. autism thread

Re: Why do people refer to bosses with titles rather than na

Posted:
Wed Apr 06, 2016 12:38 am
by Dr. Doom
Undertanker wrote:slipryy wrote:classic dr. autism thread

Why is it funny? I take interest in the way you people speak.